Sex-Positivity and Judgment
- Nov, 30, 2009
- Charlie Glickman
- sex positivity
- 4 Comments.
Let me start by coming out and saying something up front: I judge people. I judge events. I judge what I see happen around me.
There’s a myth among sex-positive folks that it’s a good thing to be non-judgmental. And while I appreciate the intention behind it, which is (usually) to create a safe space for sexual diversity and exploration, I think that it’s ultimately impossible.
There’s no shortage of sex-negative judgment out there. People regularly describe sexual practices that lots of people enjoy as sick, wrong, sinful, disgraceful, shameful, abnormal, dirty (in a bad way), and bad. I get that sex-positive want to be different from that and so they try to be non-judgmental.
But here’s where it gets interesting, in my opinion. As I said at the beginning, I make all sorts of judgments. And rather than judging myself for that (ha!), I prefer to acknowledge my biases and use language that recognizes that my judgments are the result of my own beliefs, experiences and perspectives. Or to put it another way, I own my judgment and try to avoid blaming people for how I feel or making grand pronouncements about How The World Works!tm.
One of the models that helped me think about this is Powerful Non-Defensive Communication. Sharon Ellison describes a series of events that takes place inside our minds and understanding this sequence can help us talk about our experiences from a strong and powerful place. Here’s my nutshell version of it:
- We see, hear or experience something.
- We interpret it based on what we think it means or on what we think happened.
- We have an emotional response to our interpretation.
- We place the responsibility for the emotions we feel on whatever we experienced.
Or to put it another way, we have an emotional reaction to our interpretation of what we think happened, based on our perceptions. And at any step along the way, we’re prone to misunderstandings, emotional reactions, and judgments. Until we learn to pay attention to these sorts of processes, we’re prone to become the victims of the stories we make up in our heads about other people’s actions, motivations, experiences, and decisions.
When we tell someone “you made me feel upset (or whatever)”, we give up our power in order to blame. And while that may seem like a strong statement, especially when it comes from a powerful emotion, we’ve actually handed all of the control to someone else and that’s ultimately a very weak place to be.
I learned another perspective on this from Thorn Coyle, who pointed out the difference between saying “I am sad” and “I feel sadness.” When we say “I am sad,” it becomes a statement of our identity and we’re much more prone to lose ourselves in it. When we say “I feel sadness,” it becomes one of the many things that we’re feeling at that moment, which may include any other emotions, physical sensations, and desires. We never feel just one thing- when we’re feeling sadness, we might also feel tired, or hunger, or fear, or joy. So using language that reflects that makes for more clear communication while also keeping us from getting lost in the feelings.
When I started putting these two simple and elegant concepts together, I came to see just how much I was letting my judgments come out. As I learned to pay attention to how my reactions arise, I began to be able to own them and take responsibility for them. When I learned to use language that reflected the fact that my emotions were internal feelings rather than statements of identity or descriptions of the world around me, they became much less likely to take over my experiences.
I think that this has major ramifications for sex-positivity. Speaking from a sex-positive place means that we can take responsibility for our judgments. Instead of saying that what someone does is bad or sick or wrong, we can say that we don’t understand it. Or that we have a squick around it. Or that we find it scary. Or that we are intrigued by it and are worried about what that means. Or that we believe that it causes harm to someone. Whatever the actual judgment is, when we own it, we are able to speak and act from a much more powerful place because we don’t give control of our feelings to external events. This creates an opportunity to discover whether the people doing it are, in fact, acting in ways that are contrary to their best interests or whether we just think that they are. Owning our judgments helps us keep an open mind.
Of course, all of this applies to positive judgments, as well. Practice saying “I like that” rather than “that’s good” and you may find that it helps you to also say “I don’t like that” instead of “that’s bad.” It’s the same process, and it’s just as powerful to own our positive judgments as our negative ones.
Using language like this makes room for diversity of opinion. It’s the difference between “the music is too loud” and “the music is too loud for me.” The first sentence is a judgment presented statement of fact. The second is a judgment presented as a personal experience, which can sit right next to someone else’s statement, “the music is too quiet for me” without anyone having to fight over being right.
So when people talk about being non-judgmental, I think they’re going in the wrong direction. We all judge things, whether we want to or not. Rather than trying to fight this all-too-human tendency, I think it’s better to make room for it and to work with it. I think we’re better off when we use language that helps us avoid giving up our power to our judgments.
At least, that’s my judgment.
Get New Posts In Your Inbox
Get Your Copy of The Ultimate Guide to Prostate Pleasure
Want to give your guy a treat that'll curl his toes? My book, written with Aislinn Emirzian, has all the info you need to explore prostate play. More men and their partners are discovering how much fun it can be, and our book makes it easy. Check out our website for details about upcoming workshops and appearances, lots of tips to get started, toy reviews, helpful hints, and more!
The book is available on Amazon.com, from Audible and at Good Vibrations, and at sex-positive stores everywhere.
Recent Posts
- What’s Behind Sexual Harassment?
- Rentboy.com, Sexism, and “End Demand”
- Toy Review: New Prostate Massagers by LELO
- Goodbye, Oakland. Hello, Seattle!
- Pro-Voice: A New Approach to Abortion
- Help! My Boyfriend Keeps Groping Me!
- Why I Do Live Demo Workshops
- Q&A: Why Do People Do That?
Beautiful article, Dr. Glickman. Thank you.
I think, perhaps that there is a distinction to be made between making an assessment and making a judgment. I would think that the process described from Non-Defensive Communication is the blueprint for creating an assessment, whereas proclaiming something to be something based on one’s own perspective, e.g. the “a is good, b is bad” type of scenario that you described would qualify as a judgement.
That being said, perhaps you are not nearly as judgmental as you think…
@Harlequinn I get what you’re saying. There are definitely different types of judgment/assessment/evaluation/opinions/etc. And while there are important differences among them, they still share the commonality of being a way that we judge the world around and within us. Even the process of making a distinction is, in its way, a judgment.
I don’t mind having judgments. Well, not much and not usually.
I do see your point, Charlie. I would think, however that at some juncture there has to be a distiction of some sort where that distinction is NOT a judgment and simply what something is based on a set of detailed criteria. For example, if one, from an objective, anatomical and biological standpoint defined as a “human female” – as in being appointed and equipped with the anatomically-standard female physical attributes and bioligcal processes associated with the female of a mammalian species – is it a judgement to say that that person is a woman, is female, or is it simply an assessment based, yes, paritally on subjective perception but also on meeting an objective set of criteria?
I tend to think that the means by which we attain comprehesion and understanding of the world around and within us is perception, perspective and/or point of view, while forming a judgment is a, though not the only, manner of applying what is percieved.
As I have always said…if two or more different words mean the exact same thing, then why have two or more different words for them? At some point, the distinction, no matter how minute, must exist for a reason. Words, generally speaking have very precise meanings…it is the application that is often slighly less so.
As you can see, this is a fascinating topic for me. I find it interesting how one’s perception of words and their meaning effect their reality and perception of said reality. If my perception of you is that of being a non-judgemental person differs from your as being a somewhat-judgemental person…whose perception of you would be the most accurate?
Thank you for writing about this…I enjoyed this immensely. 🙂